5 More Tech Leads To Less Creative Thinking
It’s also easy to imagine that the wealth of information and resources online would promote more creative thinking in general. But once again, the opposite appears to be true and the reason makes a great deal of sense.
Johns Hopkins and University of Illinois researchers recently conducted a study examining the effects of abundance on creativity and found that abundant resources actually lead to less creative thought. When resources are scarce, they are used more creatively.
The researchers isolated a dynamic they call the “constraint mindset,” which is a mental process motivated by scarcity. When fewer resources are available, more creative solutions are required to produce the desired result.
The study also noted that while creative thinking scores have consistently fallen since 1990, IQ scores have risen. Both effects are most pronounced in the 5–10 age group.
4 Smartphones Change Your Sleep Patterns
A 2012 Time magazine survey of 4,700 people found a great many respondents agreeing with the statement, “I don’t sleep as well as I used to because I am connected to technology all the time.” For those aged 18–24, it was fully one-quarter of them. However, there is also a scientific reason why evening smartphone use could be bad for your shut-eye.
Humans are wired to know when to sleep and when to wake by the quality of ambient light. “Red” light, the type seen at dusk, signals the body that it is nighttime while “blue” light is the signal that it’s time to wake up.
This “blue” light is obviously seen in the morning — and is also emitted by smartphones and tablets. This suppresses melatonin, a sleep-promoting chemical in the brain. According to a Harvard study, “blue” light also reduces the overall hours of REM sleep, which is crucial to healthy mental function.
3 Texting Hurts Our Ability To Communicate
Texting has become the primary form of daily communication for nearly everybody. Even Americans in older age groups now send more texts per day than they make phone calls.
Much has been made of how text and email communications can rob an exchange of context, but the problem runs deeper than this. New research suggests that texting may be slowly depriving us of our ability to read emotional cues in others.
Such nonverbal, visual cues are a critical component of conversation, and some developmental psychologists worry that a lack of experience with them can be particularly damaging to the social development of young people.
While most adults entered the mobile age with their social skills already formed, this is not the case for children and teenagers. These young people may find themselves more limited in their ability to have a face-to-face conversation than previous generations.
2 Google Makes You Retain Less Information
Virtually any piece of information can be produced with a quick Google search, which is extremely useful and highly problematic. Harvard and University of Wisconsin scientists assert in a recent research paper that this has led to the “Google effect“ — a tendency for us to treat the Internet as a sort of external hard drive for our brains, requiring us to retain less information.
One of several experiments involved the “cognitive self-esteem” of participants, which is their opinion of their own ability to remember things. The researchers found that using the Internet to find answers to questions provided a boost in cognitive self-esteem similar to that of the participants knowing the answer themselves.
The implication is that users begin to think of the Internet as being a part of their own cognitive process rather than a tool, with a corresponding decrease in the tendency to actually remember new learned information.
1 Fake News Keeps You Misinformed
The proliferation of “fake news” websites has generated a great deal of real news in 2016. These websites sometimes mimic genuine news outlets, complete with legitimate-looking URLs.
Fake news sites have come under fire for publishing misleading or outright false stories in the pursuit of clicks. One might think that such easily debunked fake stories could have little impact in the Information Age, but one Stanford study conducted in 2015 dramatically suggests otherwise.
Multiple assessments were made of the ability of middle school, high school, and college students to evaluate the trustworthiness of information online. In one, fully 80 percent of participants failed to differentiate between an article and an advertisement labeled “sponsored content” on the same page.
In another, only 25 percent of students were able to tell a verified Fox News Twitter account from a fake, with over 30 percent arguing for the legitimacy of the phony account because of graphics elements it contained.
Stanford researchers conducted the study across 12 states and were taken aback by the results. Lead researcher Sam Wineburg said, “Despite their fluency with social media, many students are unaware of basic conventions for indicating verified digital information.”